🔗 Share this article

Thhese times present a quite unique phenomenon: the inaugural US procession of the caretakers. Their qualifications differ in their skills and attributes, but they all have the common goal – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even demolition, of Gaza’s fragile peace agreement. After the war ended, there have been rare days without at least one of the former president's envoys on the territory. Just recently saw the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all arriving to execute their roles.

Israel keeps them busy. In just a few short period it executed a set of operations in the region after the loss of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – resulting, according to reports, in dozens of local injuries. Multiple leaders called for a restart of the war, and the Knesset passed a early decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The US stance was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

But in more than one sense, the US leadership seems more intent on maintaining the current, uneasy phase of the peace than on moving to the next: the rebuilding of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it appears the US may have goals but no specific proposals.

For now, it is unknown at what point the proposed global oversight committee will truly begin operating, and the identical is true for the designated security force – or even the identity of its members. On a recent day, a US official said the US would not impose the structure of the international unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's government persists to dismiss various proposals – as it did with the Ankara's proposal recently – what follows? There is also the opposite point: which party will determine whether the troops supported by the Israelis are even willing in the assignment?

The matter of how long it will require to demilitarize Hamas is just as vague. “The expectation in the leadership is that the international security force is going to at this point take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” stated Vance this week. “It’s will require a while.” Trump further highlighted the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation recently that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to disarm. So, hypothetically, the unknown elements of this still unformed global force could arrive in the territory while Hamas militants continue to hold power. Are they dealing with a administration or a insurgent group? These represent only some of the issues surfacing. Others might ask what the outcome will be for average Palestinians in the present situation, with the group carrying on to focus on its own adversaries and opposition.

Latest developments have once again emphasized the gaps of local media coverage on each side of the Gazan frontier. Each outlet attempts to analyze every possible aspect of Hamas’s breaches of the truce. And, typically, the fact that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the bodies of deceased Israeli captives has dominated the headlines.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant fatalities in the region caused by Israeli strikes has received scant attention – if at all. Take the Israeli counter strikes in the wake of Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which two soldiers were lost. While Gaza’s officials reported dozens of fatalities, Israeli news analysts questioned the “light response,” which hit only infrastructure.

That is typical. Over the past few days, Gaza’s press agency alleged Israeli forces of infringing the peace with the group multiple occasions after the truce came into effect, causing the death of 38 individuals and harming another many more. The claim appeared unimportant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was just missing. That included accounts that eleven members of a local household were lost their lives by Israeli forces last Friday.

The rescue organization stated the family had been seeking to go back to their home in the a Gaza City district of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was attacked for allegedly crossing the “demarcation line” that marks zones under Israeli army command. This boundary is not visible to the ordinary view and is visible only on maps and in government documents – often not available to everyday people in the area.

Yet this event scarcely got a note in Israeli media. One source referred to it shortly on its digital site, referencing an IDF spokesperson who stated that after a questionable car was detected, forces shot cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle kept to approach the troops in a manner that created an direct danger to them. The troops opened fire to neutralize the threat, in compliance with the ceasefire.” Zero injuries were stated.

Given such narrative, it is little wonder numerous Israeli citizens think Hamas solely is to at fault for breaking the peace. This perception threatens encouraging appeals for a more aggressive stance in Gaza.

Eventually – perhaps in the near future – it will not be enough for US envoys to act as kindergarten teachers, advising Israel what not to do. They will {have to|need